SteelEquivalents.com

Explore

MaterialsSteel materials by standardCategoriesSteel material categoriesSearchSteel grade searchCalculatorsSteel calculatorsServicesCutting, machining and finishing to order
Latest news
Knowledge & SafetySteel WikiGrades, standards and metallurgy explained
Help & SupportContactGet in touch with the teamFAQCommon questions answeredSupport Chat pageFAQs, guides & live chat in one place
Settings

Appearance

Accent

Language

Welcome

Sign in to save favorites and manage your account.

Carbon Equivalent Calculator (CEV, CET, Pcm)
Welding

Carbon Equivalent Calculator (CEV, CET, Pcm)

Three published formulas — IIW CEV, EN 1011-2 CET, Ito–Bessyo Pcm — each enforced within its own validity window. Enter the ladle analysis in % by mass. A real GET form: computes correctly with JavaScript off.

Formula
This formula uses C, Mn, Cr, Mo, V, Ni, Cu — other fields are ignored, never silently mixed in.
Composition (% by mass)
Reset Recalculates on submit — the same value renders with JavaScript off.
Download as PDFResult sheet · A4Run a calculation first — then the sheet is ready to download.

Carbon equivalent — frequently asked

Which formula should I use?

CEV (IIW) is the classic for C–Mn structural steels; CET drives the EN 1011-2 method B preheat calculation; Pcm (Ito–Bessyo) suits modern low-carbon, low-alloy steels. Follow whichever your welding specification names.

What happens to elements the chosen formula does not use?

They are ignored — and the page says so above the fields. Each formula was fitted with its own element set; quietly mixing in extra terms would produce a number no standard defines.

Why does the calculator refuse compositions outside the window?

Because the formulas are empirical fits, only validated inside their published composition windows. Outside them the number still computes — but predicts nothing. The refusal names the exact violated bound instead.